Gradient walk

Threat Scale: Individual → Systemic

Individual 0 → 1 Systemic

12 works, one per band of Threat Scale, chained for the smoothest structural ascent — each step is the smallest possible shape mutation that still climbs the axis.

  1. Stanislaw Lem, 1971
    Threat Scale score 0.15
    start
  2. Stanislaw Lem, 1971
    Threat Scale score 0.20
    step distance 0.4753
    agrees most onConflict StylePrice Type
  3. Ted Chiang, 2019
    Threat Scale score 0.30
    step distance 0.4293
    Time StructurePacing
  4. Ted Chiang, 2019
    Threat Scale score 0.32
    step distance 0.2935
    Threat ScaleTime Structure
  5. William Gibson, 1996
    Threat Scale score 0.45
    step distance 0.8585
    Time StructurePrice Type
  6. William Gibson, 2007
    Threat Scale score 0.48
    step distance 0.3519
    Threat ScaleProtagonist Fate
  7. Alfred Bester, 1953
    Threat Scale score 0.60
    step distance 0.3659
    Conflict StyleTime Structure
  8. William Gibson, 1999
    Threat Scale score 0.62
    step distance 0.3490
    Threat ScaleProtagonist Fate
  9. Orson Scott Card, 1985
    Threat Scale score 0.75
    step distance 0.3058
    Time StructureProtagonist Fate
  10. David Brin, 1983
    Threat Scale score 0.82
    step distance 0.1431
    PacingPrice Type
  11. Robert A. Heinlein, 1966
    Threat Scale score 0.88
    step distance 0.3743
    Conflict StyleTime Structure
  12. Joe Haldeman, 1997
    Threat Scale score 0.92
    step distance 0.2893
    Time StructurePrice Type

Back to all walks