Gradient walk
Threat Scale: Individual → Systemic
Individual 0 → 1 Systemic
12 works, one per band of Threat Scale, chained for the smoothest structural ascent — each step is the smallest possible shape mutation that still climbs the axis.
- Stanislaw Lem, 1971Threat Scale score 0.15start
- Stanislaw Lem, 1971Threat Scale score 0.20step distance 0.4753agrees most onConflict StylePrice Type
- Ted Chiang, 2019Threat Scale score 0.30step distance 0.4293Time StructurePacing
- Ted Chiang, 2019Threat Scale score 0.32step distance 0.2935Threat ScaleTime Structure
- William Gibson, 1996Threat Scale score 0.45step distance 0.8585Time StructurePrice Type
- William Gibson, 2007Threat Scale score 0.48step distance 0.3519Threat ScaleProtagonist Fate
- Alfred Bester, 1953Threat Scale score 0.60step distance 0.3659Conflict StyleTime Structure
- William Gibson, 1999Threat Scale score 0.62step distance 0.3490Threat ScaleProtagonist Fate
- Orson Scott Card, 1985Threat Scale score 0.75step distance 0.3058Time StructureProtagonist Fate
- David Brin, 1983Threat Scale score 0.82step distance 0.1431PacingPrice Type
- Robert A. Heinlein, 1966Threat Scale score 0.88step distance 0.3743Conflict StyleTime Structure
- Joe Haldeman, 1997Threat Scale score 0.92step distance 0.2893Time StructurePrice Type