Gradient walk

Threat Scale: Individual → Systemic

Individual 0 → 1 Systemic

11 works, one per band of Threat Scale, chained for the smoothest structural ascent — each step is the smallest possible shape mutation that still climbs the axis.

  1. Jorge Luis Borges, 1944
    Threat Scale score 0.15
    start
  2. Ted Chiang, 2019
    Threat Scale score 0.20
    step distance 0.2281
    agrees most onProtagonist FateConflict Style
  3. Ted Chiang, 2002
    Threat Scale score 0.30
    step distance 0.3284
    Price TypeConflict Style
  4. Frederik Pohl, 1977
    Threat Scale score 0.35
    step distance 0.1888
    PacingProtagonist Fate
  5. Stanislaw Lem, 1971
    Threat Scale score 0.40
    step distance 0.4885
    PacingPrice Type
  6. Mary Doria Russell, 1996
    Threat Scale score 0.55
    step distance 0.3373
    Conflict StylePacing
  7. Christopher Priest, 2002
    Threat Scale score 0.65
    step distance 0.2373
    Price TypeProtagonist Fate
  8. Ted Chiang, 2019
    Threat Scale score 0.75
    step distance 0.4243
    Conflict StyleTime Structure
  9. Ted Chiang, 2002
    Threat Scale score 0.80
    step distance 0.1568
    PacingPrice Type
  10. Stanislaw Lem, 1961
    Threat Scale score 0.90
    step distance 0.3061
    Conflict StylePrice Type
  11. Samuel R. Delany, 1984
    Threat Scale score 0.95
    step distance 0.1886
    Conflict StylePacing

Back to all walks