Gradient walk

Pacing: Action-Driven → Observational

Action-Driven 0 → 1 Observational

12 works, one per band of Pacing, chained for the smoothest structural ascent — each step is the smallest possible shape mutation that still climbs the axis.

  1. Stanislaw Lem, 1965
    Pacing score 0.28
    start
  2. Stanislaw Lem, 1965
    Pacing score 0.35
    step distance 0.5242
    agrees most onTime StructureProtagonist Fate
  3. Martha Wells, 2020
    Pacing score 0.38
    step distance 0.7919
    Conflict StyleThreat Scale
  4. William Gibson, 1999
    Pacing score 0.45
    step distance 0.4188
    Price TypeTime Structure
  5. William Gibson, 2007
    Pacing score 0.48
    step distance 0.3626
    PacingTime Structure
  6. Vernor Vinge, 2006
    Pacing score 0.55
    step distance 0.3178
    Time StructureProtagonist Fate
  7. William Gibson, 1988
    Pacing score 0.60
    step distance 0.4341
    Price TypeThreat Scale
  8. Michael Chabon, 2007
    Pacing score 0.65
    step distance 0.2088
    Price TypeProtagonist Fate
  9. Jeff VanderMeer, 2014
    Pacing score 0.70
    step distance 0.4383
    Time StructureThreat Scale
  10. Ursula K. Le Guin, 1969
    Pacing score 0.75
    step distance 0.5597
    Protagonist FateThreat Scale
  11. Samuel R. Delany, 1984
    Pacing score 0.78
    step distance 0.1571
    Price TypeProtagonist Fate
  12. Ted Chiang, 2019
    Pacing score 0.85
    step distance 0.4961
    Protagonist FatePrice Type

Back to all walks