Gradient walk

Pacing: Action-Driven → Observational

Action-Driven 0 → 1 Observational

12 works, one per band of Pacing, chained for the smoothest structural ascent — each step is the smallest possible shape mutation that still climbs the axis.

  1. William Gibson, 1986
    Pacing score 0.20
    start
  2. William Gibson, 1993
    Pacing score 0.25
    step distance 0.6870
    agrees most onThreat ScaleTime Structure
  3. William Gibson, 2019
    Pacing score 0.35
    step distance 0.9555
    Conflict StylePacing
  4. Alastair Reynolds, 2000
    Pacing score 0.40
    step distance 0.2378
    Time StructureThreat Scale
  5. Vernor Vinge, 1992
    Pacing score 0.45
    step distance 0.5493
    Protagonist FateThreat Scale
  6. William Gibson, 1999
    Pacing score 0.55
    step distance 0.3248
    Protagonist FateThreat Scale
  7. N. K. Jemisin, 2017
    Pacing score 0.60
    step distance 0.6278
    Threat ScaleProtagonist Fate
  8. Dan Simmons, 1989
    Pacing score 0.65
    step distance 0.2867
    Price TypeProtagonist Fate
  9. Jorge Luis Borges, 1944
    Pacing score 0.78
    step distance 0.4244
    Time StructureProtagonist Fate
  10. Ted Chiang, 2019
    Pacing score 0.85
    step distance 0.3974
    Conflict StyleTime Structure
  11. Samuel R. Delany, 1984
    Pacing score 0.90
    step distance 0.3780
    Price TypeTime Structure
  12. Jorge Luis Borges, 1944
    Pacing score 0.95
    step distance 0.2271
    Time StructureThreat Scale

Back to all walks